COMPLIANCE WATCH: Investor Standards Could Get More Scrutiny
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–Concerns about the sale of private placements to less-than-sophisticated investors could get aired in U.S. Congress yet again as lawmakers try to reconcile two versions of the financial reform bill.
A joint Senate and House of Representatives conference committee has started its work, and those efforts could include discussion of standards for accredited investors. Those standards, set almost 20 years ago, are supposed to help ensure that private placements are marketed only to institutions and other well-to-do sophisticated investors.
Senate’s financial reform bill, passed in May, would extend for at least four more years the $1 million minimum in net worth required to be eligible to purchase the securities. The provision would exclude, however, the value of an investor‘s primary home, which now counts toward reaching that threshold.
“It’s progress. It means you don’t automatically become an accredited investor because you own a house in New York or San Francisco,” says Barbara Roper, director of investor protection for the Consumer Federation of America, an advocacy group.
The premise behind maintaining the $1 million threshold and other accredited investor standards, however, is wrong, she says. “We make assumptions–of sophisticated investors not needing protections of securities laws–that are clearly false,” she says.
The bill that passed the House doesn’t address private placements.
The Senate stance was a compromise, say lawyers and other start-up company advocates who have followed the legislative process. Trade groups, such as the Angel Capital Association in Overland Park, Kan., sought to maintain the current accredited investor standards which, they argued, made private placements available to a wider audience of potential investors.
Many start-up companies are relying on private placements as their primary source of financing, particularly as conventional lenders have tightened their credit standards during the turbulent economy.
The same groups, however, also sought to eliminate a provision in an earlier version of the legislation that would have required issuers to file their offerings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which then would have 120 days to review filings. Businesses that needed cash would not be able to wait out the four months, they argued. That view prevailed, and the waiting period was eventually stricken from the Senate bill.
Meanwhile, investor advocates sought to increase accredited investor standards, amid a spate of allegedly fraudulent offerings of private placements through brokerages. Many Reg-D securities, as private placements are also called, aren’t sold through brokerages but directly by companies to accredited investors.
Investors complaints, however, continue to rise, say lawyers. Reg-D offerings are becoming increasingly attractive to small and independent broker dealers, which can earn between commissions between 7% and 10%.
Lawyers who represent investors are skeptical that eliminating the value of a person’s primary residence from the calculation of net worth will achieve much. The premise that an investor is sophisticated if he or she has $1 million in assets is flawed, says Nicholas Thomas, a securities lawyer in Vero Beach, Fla. “There are a lot of ways to make a million – such as buying a stock 30 years ago that quadrupled,” he says. “That doesn’t make them savvy investors.”
Thomas represents an investor who was recently awarded $400,000 from a brokerage in a securities arbitration case involving private placement notes offered by Medical Provider Funding Corp. VI, the subject of a 2009 civil fraud complaint by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The brokerage, Peak Securities Corp. in Largo, Fla., is no longer Finra-registered. Thomas says he will pursue collections.
Joseph Wallin, a Seattle-based lawyer who represents start-up companies, says there are competing interests. Providing start-ups and other small businesses with access to capital benefits the economy by helping to produce jobs. Furthermore, the vast majority of private placements are sold to issuers’ personal contacts, since marketing the securities is against SEC rules.
Those investors and others could benefit from a few simple rules of thumb when deciding whether to invest in private placements, he says.
“These are high-risk deals. You should only put a small portion of portfolio in these things,” says Wallin. “These investments shouldn’t even be made if you’re not willing to let the money go.”
By Suzanne Barlyn A DOW JONES NEWSWIRES COLUMN
Since 1999, the founders of PPM have provided professional business writing services, such as a PPM or business plan, to more than 2,000 businesses worldwide. Our company is considered to be the most cost effective, efficient consultants for private placement memorandum development in the United States. We are Wall Street’s, and by extension, the New York private placement (PPM) leaders.
PPM’s main service is the creation of private placement memorandum regulation d (Reg. d) documents. However, we offer much more. In case the entrepreneur needs additional services, such as a business plan, website, or additional legal work, PPM can create one pricing package for all required documentation or service. Because we simultaneously work with many companies both in and out of the U.S., the ability to adapt to the individual needs – as well as to regional and global demands – helps our clients save needed capital and time.
We are leaders in:
• New York Private Placement
• Real Estate Private Placement
• Technology Private Placement
• Debt Private Placement
• Equity Private Placement
• Technology Private Placement Memorandum Writing
• New York Private Placement Memorandum Writing
• Real Estate Private Placement Memorandum Writing
• Debt Private Placement Memorandum Writing
The CEO of PPM was interviewed by the same author in January 2010. To read the interview with PPM’s CEO, choose on of the of the following links:
Page 4 of Newspaper